The Other American Dirt Issue: Is Fear of Appropriation Fomenting a Culture of Censorship?

March 4, 2020 | By | 7 Replies More

I was recently in the NPR studios in New York to participate in the show, 1A’s, panel discussion on the enduring American Dirt kerfuffle, specifically, “What The Controversy Over ‘American Dirt’ Tells Us About Publishing And Authorship.”  

Seated in the studio with me was Vox culture writer, Constance Grady, and from two remote locations we were joined by Mexican-American translator, poet and author, David Bowles, and K. Tempest Bradford, a writer and the instructor of Writing The Other workshops.

All three had distinct and individual takes on the controversy over American Dirt, and the conversation, led by host Todd Zwillich, focused on two main issues: the publishing industry’s lack of diversity in both opportunity and representation of Latin voices (diverse voices in general), and the pushback against authors taking on stories and characters outside their own cultures.

Why was I there? 

As the author of The Alchemy of Noise [She Writes Press, 2019], a novel centered on an interracial relationship struggling under the weight of culture clashes, familial acrimony, and the devastation of a violent arrest, my publishing experience had some relevance to the issues at hand: I was a white author diving into and exploring the lives of several and varied characters outside my own culture.

The bulk of the 1A conversation focused on three things: the lack of representation of Latinx writers in the publishing world, the hyperbolic support of a white author telling a Mexican story while Mexican writers are disproportionately excluded from those rarefied opportunities, and the opinion of many Latinx writers that “she got it wrong,” with stereotypical characters, inaccurate depictions of both country and culture, in a story written “for the white gaze,” as one Latinx author put it. 

Those angles, widely covered and outside my purview, still rumble today. David Bowles recently put a call out on Twitter: “If you’re Mexican, Mexican American, or otherwise intimately familiar with Mexico, I’m hoping you’ll ‘sign up’ below to look closely and critically at a single chapter,” rejecting the notion “that we’re blowing up a couple of inaccuracies to condemn the whole book.” 

I, however, was brought in to talk about the second issue of the debate: is the demand for #OwnVoices equity and the fear of “appropriation” fostering censorship and a growing concern amongst authors that they cannot venture anywhere outside their own cultures? To me, that’s as important an issue as the first, with the potential to have long-ranging impact on the artistic freedom of all writers.

The questions asked of me specifically had mostly to do with my experience as a white author pushing a novel with diverse characters, an experience, I made clear, that was wildly divergent from that of Jeanine Cummins, American Dirt’s author. Not only was there no bidding war, no seven-figure advance; no intense publicity campaign, A-list endorsements, or Oprah pick, but even with two well-received and previously published (albeit, self—) novels, even with a story considered topical and relevant, even with accolades from a wide range of industry-connected readers, I could not—to use a phrase relevant to my story—get arrested. In a nutshell, I was repeatedly told, not by one but many agents from topline literary agencies, that I would be unable to get my book published: 

  1. “Your whiteness is kind of a problem,” one agent wrote: “This is a well written and serious novel that could not be more current but there may be an issue of whose voice gets to represent race.”
  2. Another admitted she “didn’t have the courage” to take on a book that “might stir controversy.”
  3. A third stated that her rejection was “because of all the concerns about ‘cultural appropriation’ these days. These are brutal times in fiction,” she wrote, “and I’m not comfortable representing a book, no matter how good or worthy, in which that issue is present.”
  4. A fourth (a white male) felt the black male protagonist “didn’t sound black enough.” I’ll just leave that one there…

But the overriding message was clear: I was a white author; I could not include black characters in prominent roles in my book and expect to be published. At a writer’s conference I attended in 2018, I heard that same admonition repeated to countless white authors with diverse characters and storylines. Not only did I find this appalling, but it was daunting to me on a personal level, having spent years writing, researching, interviewing, and fine-tuning a book that was vetted by a wide swath of writers, activists, readers, and opinion leaders from both the black and white communities, and deemed “right.”  

Luckily for me, The Alchemy of Noise was ultimately picked up by innovative publisher, Brooke Warner of She Writes Press. Going with a hybrid publisher that fiercely curates their acquisitions but requires authors to co-invest meant that not only was I not gifted an advance (much less seven figures!), but I went into pocket so my book could see the light of day, with the promise of higher royalties when it did. It was a deal I was willing to make, committed as I was to the story I’d written, and unwilling to further wrangle with fainthearted, stonewalling gatekeepers.

But the question asked—whose voice gets to tell stories of race?—was left unanswered, and I wanted to answer it: 

Everyone’s voice.

From our individual, unique, and creative points of view, we each have a stake in chronicling the world in which we live or or the ones we imagine. Our cultures, our diverse experiences, the spectrum of characters we create cannot be monotone, homogenized, or “one cultured.” Our world isn’t; why should our stories be? 

My journey also differed from Cummins’ in the genesis of my story; Alchemy’s fictional narrative was extrapolated from personal experience. Years earlier I’d been in a long-term relationship with a man of color, intimately involved with the people in his life and the caustic experiences he endured. I possessed “learned-perspective,” a unique angle from which to dig into pervasive issues of race, and, given our culture’s continuing battles with white privilege, police profiling, and social injustice, the story remained painfully relevant. So I created characters to whom I gave many of the obstacles we had faced, and told the story as authentically, honestly, and sensitively as I could.

Did I “get it right”? I think so, I hope so; the response from readers within the black community has been uniformly positive. But I did not get the same intense, microscopic examination Cummins has. Then again, my book wasn’t an instant, widely disseminated, ecstatically promoted bestseller either! If it was, would I have experienced something of the same? Which brings me to the title prompt of this piece. 

Several of those who weighed in on American Dirt stated categorically that white authors—or any authors, for that matter—should be unlimited in who and what they can write about, but if they do venture into cultures outside their own, they’ve got to get it right: Do the work, check the work, vet the work; honor the nuances and sensibilities they’re writing about. This stance has been stated by many of the Latinx writers who took umbrage with Cummins (who, they felt, didn’t get it right), as well as countless black authors who’ve also addressed the tilt toward censorship in the drive for greater inclusivity and the right to tell their own stories. 

Will the publishing industry make a commensurate promise? Will they pledge to judge each book, each writer, based on the quality of the writing and the merit of the story, regardless of creed, culture, color, gender or orientation? Or will they continue to hide behind “fears” of getting caught up in American Dirt-sized controversy? 

Even Flatiron Books (the publisher of American Dirt) acceded to making mistakes in how that book was rolled out; will other publishing companies also recognize the frustrations of both underrepresented writers and those being censored and shut out? Will they accept that publishing’s lack of inclusivity cannot be solved by excluding other voices (which is just lazy thinking)? No writer of any demographic should feel stymied in their choice of content, theme or character. No writer of any demographic should be systemically excluded from opportunities offered another subset of writer. All work, all writers should be judged individually, uniquely, and based on the quality, authenticity, and excellence of what they have written.

If that can honestly and enduringly happen, if the righteous demand for equitability finds its way to a real solution; if antiquated systems of patriarchy and white privilege in the industry can be broken down and abolished, inciting change in the way we do things, then this moment of literary evolution, however painful and confusing, will have netted positive results.

Let’s hope it does.

  Visit www.lorrainedevonwilke.com for details and links to LDW’s books, music, photography, and articles.

Lorraine Devon Wilke’s writing resume includes over a decade as a political/cultural contributor to HuffPost and other popular media/news sites. Her articles have been globally disseminated, reprinted in books, articles, and academic tomes. She continues to write cultural essays and commentary through her blog, www.rockpapermusic.com, and her third novel, The Alchemy of Noise, is being published in April via She Writes Press.

Links to her work, writing awards, and other details of her creative background can be found at www.lorrainedevonwilke.com

About THE ALCHEMY OF NOISE

“Infused with beauty, humor, and pain, The Alchemy of Noise is a modern American love story that asks if love can bridge the distance between two Americas.”

―Laura Nicole Diamond, author of Shelter Us and Deliver Me

In a world so full of lonely people and broken hearts, Chris Hawkins, a black sound engineer from Chicago’s south side, and Sidonie Frame―white, suburban-raised, the head manager of one of the city’s most elite venues―meet by work-related happenstance and fall quickly in love, convinced that by that act alone they can inspire peace, joy, and happiness in the world around them. The world, however, has other ideas.

Their meeting is serendipitous. Chris, who owns and runs his company, largely spends his time surrounded by members of his own community; Sidonie, conversely, is rarely outside the environs of work and its predominantly white staff and clientele. But when the club’s sound manager goes AWOL on the night of a big event and Chris is hired to come in as a last-minute replacement, their destinies collide.

Immediately drawn to each other, they fall quickly into an unexpected and thrilling relationship, inspiring myriad reactions amongst family and friends on both sides of the racial divide. But even as their love story evolves, day-to-day tensions, police disruptions, and the microaggressions Chris constantly encounters as a black man in the gritty environs of Chicago become a cultural flashpoint, challenging Sidonie’s privileged worldview and Chris’s ability to translate the unfolding events. After a random and gut-wrenching series of police encounters shakes their resilience, it’s the shattering circumstance of a violent arrest―one in which Chris is identified as a serial vandal and potential rapist―that sends their world into free fall.

He claims his innocence; she believes him. But the forces pushing against them are many and oppressive. With a looming trial, the dissipating loyalties of key allies, and unforeseen twists triggering doubt and suspicion, Sidonie and Chris are driven to question what they really know of each other and just whom to trust, leading to a powerful and emotional conclusion.

Lorraine Devon Wilke’s third novel, The Alchemy of Noise, ventures beyond the humor and pathos of family drama explored so cleverly in her first two novels to dig deep into the politics of contemporary culture. At its heart a love story, it explores the complexity of race in a suspenseful drama driven by issues of privilege, prejudice, police profiling and legal entanglements, and the disparities in how those provocative themes impact the various and diverse characters involved.

 

Tags: ,

Category: Contemporary Women Writers, Women Writers

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Sheila Welch says:

    As a published writer of fiction for children, I have been observing for years this trend toward limiting authors’ voices. It has already begun to cause many of us to self-censor. Why should any writer pour her time and effort into research if publishers are unwilling to accept books that are created by writers who are different from their characters? Following the logic of this “rule” to its extreme means each author can write only first person, past tense tales. No women may create male characters, no blacks may include the thoughts of white characters, and no one may write historical fiction (unless time travel is possible).

    Reading fiction, studies suggest, helps children develop empathy, which is, I think, a desirable human emotion. Authors work hard to make their characters seem realistic so their readers become invested in these imagined people — or animals. Yes, we do need more diverse books for and by all sorts of authors. But the quality of a book is more important than what the author looks like. I feel as though we will lose so much by dismissing authors because of their background. Let’s each of us expand our knowledge and look for the most engaging stories then tell them the best we can.

    No two authors have identical abilities and each of us has many unique perspectives. I know Mildred Taylor was never a teenaged white kid, nor Ezra Jack Keats a small black boy, nor E.B. White a runt piglet. But those characters, (Jeremy Simms, Peter and Wilbur) helped readers to step out of their own lives, walk in the shoes of another, and even helped open doors for writers who’d been denied access so long. Rather than adhering to some new narrow-minded rules, let’s open our minds and our hearts.

    • Sheila:

      I could not agree with you more, across the board. Your comment is not only thoughtful and thorough, but spells out, in poignant detail, so many specific aspects of why this trend — as a misguided remedy to the lack of diversity in the industry — is so corrosive.

      I hope the noise from all sides of this debate gets and stays loud enough to truly shake up the publishing industry in a way that permanently changes entrenched, systemic exclusions.

      Thanks for reading and for your wonderful comment!

      Best,

      Lorraine

  2. Jeanne Felfe says:

    I was also told by an agent that she wouldn’t be able to sell a novel I was (and am still) working on because one of the POV characters (and her family) are black Muslim immigrants, and I am none of those things. The story is told in the deep USA south and the other characters are white and native to the area. I am not telling an immigrant story…I am telling a human story.
    Yes, sensitivity is needed. But without the cultural clash that is central to the story, there is no story. To tell me I can’t write about characters unlike myself means I can only write white middle-middle-class 60+ year old grandmothers. And no men either.

    Now, what’s really interesting is the book I am currently reading, Such a Fun Age, written by a black woman, has two POV characters – a black woman and a white woman. It is BOTH of their stories, not just a black story. So how is that okay and yet it’s not okay for me to write a similar one?

    • Jeanne:

      First of all, your books sounds really interesting, a story I’d love to read, so I’m sorry you got that kind of pushback from an agent. Obviously, since you read the article, you know I went through the same thing, over and over, which was not only upsetting to me on a personal level, but rang all sorts of alarms bell for me as part of the literary community.

      I think sensitivity, authenticity, research, thoughtful work put in, to make sure characters and stories outside our cultures are realistic and representative, are all really important and should be employed. But I also think agents and publishers — and even other writers — can’t just give lip service to the notion of “anybody should be able to writer anything—as long as they get it right,” but have to actually honor it by NOT making comments like the kind both you and I heard.

      The industry and its gatekeepers also need to do more than pay lip service to the notion of diversifying and expanding opportunities for #OwnVoices and writers of diverse demographics. They have to DO it.

      Thanks for reading and commenting, and good luck on your book!

      Best,

      Lorraine

  3. Wonderfully timely, thoughtful article. I couldn’t agree more.

Leave a Reply